Gmsh design microfluidics1/31/2024 ![]() Our primary motivation is development and optimization of devices used for efficient circulating tumor cell (CTC) capture, such as described in, which can be used for early diagnostics and management of treatment of cancer. There are currently many open problems in the research of microfluidic devices used for analysis of specific properties of blood samples. This has a significant future potential when applied to processing data from videos of microfluidic flows. Another application of this system of bases is using it as a comparison tool for different modeled situations. While for uncomplicated box channels there is no advantage in using a system of bases instead of a simple prediction using fluid streamlines, in a more complicated geometry, the neural network is significantly more accurate. Even larger increase was observed when it was used to predict trajectories of cells with different elastic properties. We observe about two-fold increase in mean relative error when a network trained on one geometry is used to predict trajectories in a modified geometry. Afterwards, the network is able to predict the movement of the red blood cells because it is a system of bases that gives an approximate cell velocity at each point of the simulation channel as a linear combination of bases.In a simple box geometry, the neural network gives results comparable to predictions using fluid streamlines, however in a channel with obstacles forming slits, the neural network is about five times more accurate.The network can also be used as a discriminator between different situations. Alternatively, the data could come from video processing of a recording of a biological experiment. The neural network uses data from the numerical simulation for learning, however, the simulation needs only be run once. Instead of simplifying the simulation, we use a neural network to predict the movement of the red blood cells. However, larger volumes or timescales require different approaches. This can be done quite precisely in small channels and within a short timeframe. In such numerical models, we primarily need to take into consideration the movement and behavior of the dominant component of the blood, the red blood cells. I have example code for doing just that in Python for a case where I needed a mesh that was finer in some areas than others.For optimization of microfluidic devices for the analysis of blood samples, it is useful to simulate blood cells as elastic objects in flow of blood plasma. area file if the desired sizes are depend on where you are. To get triangles of given area, you can either give it a command line switch, or you can write a special. You only have to describe the boundary if the domain isn't convex. With Triangle, you can just give it a point cloud it will compute the convex hull for you and then triangulate the interior. In gmsh, you'd have to specify a line loop that parameterizes the convex hull of your input points. I have code for this in C, Fortran and Python if you'd rather be spared the trouble. Its input/output file formats are much simpler, so you can quite easily write scripts to either create or parse them. You've mentioned gmsh, but I actually prefer using the program Triangle for most meshing tasks. Chapter 8 in Hjelle's book on triangulations covers scattered data interpolation and may be of some use to you. When you lift the 2D triangulation to a surface mesh, the outcome may be less than ideal depending on the slopes of the surface. Triangulation algorithms, like the one Tyler Olsen linked, are optimized for certain criteria (maximize the minimum angle). Since your surface is fairly smooth, rather than generating a surface mesh, you can generate a 2D mesh of just the $(x, y)$-points that have been sampled, and then create a surface mesh by adding in the $z$-values later.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply.AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |